|
Table
of Contents
|
|
Introduction |
|
Project
Area Description |
|
Purpose
and Content of the Study |
|
Methodology |
|
Data
Collection |
|
Mail
Surveys and Interviews |
|
Traffic
Counts, Spot Counts, and Tailrace Counts |
|
Flyovers |
|
Existing
Recreation Areas and Facilities |
|
Data
Analysis |
|
Recreation
Use Assessment |
|
Boat
Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Recreation
Demand Assessment |
|
Limitations |
|
Consultation
|
|
Summary
of Recreation Resources |
|
Summary
of Regional Recreation Resources |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Key Characteristics |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Project Area Recreation Areas |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Project Area Recreation Use Assessment |
|
General
Recreation User Characteristics |
|
Recreation
Use |
|
Boating
Use |
|
Project
Area Recreation Resources |
|
Lake
James |
|
Lake
James Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
James Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
James Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
James Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Hickory |
|
Lake
Hickory Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Hickory Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Hickory Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Hickory Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Norman |
|
Lake
Norman Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Norman Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Norman Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Norman Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Mountain
Island Lake |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Wylie |
|
Lake
Wylie Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Wylie Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Wylie Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Wylie Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes |
|
Great Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Existing Recreation Areas |
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Recreation Use
Assessment |
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Boat Carrying
Capacity Assessment |
|
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Survey Respondent Commentsss |
|
Lake
Wateree |
|
Lake
Wateree Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Wateree Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Wateree Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Wateree Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake Wylie, the third largest reservoir in the Catawba-Wateree
system, is located southwest of Charlotte in Gaston and Mecklenburg Counties,
North Carolina and York County, South Carolina. Lake Wylie has a surface
area of about 13,433 acres and 314.7 shoreline miles at full pond elevation
of 569.4 feet msl. Table 4.7-1 summarizes the shoreline classification,
based on the SMP maps.
| Table 4.7-1. |
Shoreline Classification for Lake Wylie
|
|
Shoreline Classification
|
Shoreline Miles
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Commercial /Non-Residential
|
7.2
|
2.0%
|
|
Commercial /Residential
|
1.9
|
1.0%
|
|
Residential
|
129.1
|
41.0%
|
|
Business Industrial
|
3.6
|
1.0%
|
|
Public Recreation
|
3.4
|
1.0%
|
|
Public Infrastructure
|
16.2
|
5.0%
|
|
Project Operations
|
1.5
|
0.0%
|
|
Future Commercial/Non-Residential
|
10.8
|
3.0%
|
|
Future Commercial/Residential
|
23.0
|
7.0%
|
|
Future Residential
|
14.9
|
5.0%
|
|
Future Public Recreation
|
9.9
|
3.0%
|
|
Impact Minimization Zones
|
9.3
|
3.0%
|
|
Environmental Area
|
61.7
|
20.0%
|
|
Natural Area
|
22.2
|
7.0%
|
Total
|
314.8
|
100.0%
|
| 4.7.1 |
Lake Wylie Existing
Recreation Areas |
There are nine developed Duke Power owned public recreation
access locations, with three leased to agencies, on Lake Wylie. There
are several developed county and city parks including: McDowell Nature
Preserve, owned and operated by Mecklenburg County; River Street Park,
owned and operated by the City of Mount Holly; Wind Jammer Beach and Pitcarin
Parks, owned by the City of Tega Cay; and the Stowe Botanical Garden.
There are three undeveloped county parks owned by Mecklenburg County.
Figure 4.7-shows the public recreation access locations. In addition,
there are 11 commercial non-residential and no commercial residential
marinas that provide additional public access on Lake Wylie.
The Copperhead Access Area is operated as part of McDowell
County Nature Preserve that is owned by Mecklenburg County. Ebenezer Access
Area is operated by York County as a county park. The City of Rock Hill
has the Indian Ground Access Area leased for fishing use by special populations.
A recent major addition to public recreation on Lake Wylie was the creation
of Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden on the South Fork arm of the lake. This
facility consists of 450 acres of land that has the gardens being developed
over a 20-year period.
|
Click Here
to View Full
Figure 4.7-1
Lake Wylie Public Recreation Access Areas
|
 |
Existing Duke-Owned Public Access Areas
The developed Duke-owned public access areas provide about
333 acres and about 27,803 feet of shoreline frontage of public access
at Lake Wylie. Combined, the developed access areas have 24 public boat
ramps, 12 loading piers, 4 fishing piers and about 568 parking spaces
for vehicles/trailers and 305 parking spaces for cars. Table 4.7-2 summarizes
the facilities at the public access areas.
In the 1994 SMP, Duke Power proposed to improve the Allen
Fishing area (provide handicapped accessibility), Buster Boyd access area
(replace the two 2-lane ramps with 6 new boat ramps and replace the pier
with 3 new piers) and Nivens Creek access area (expand and pave the parking
lot). In addition, Duke Power said it would add 36 acres to the South
Point site (54 acres added), add 98 acres to the Allison Creek access
area (59 added), add 25 acres to the Fort Mill site (40 acres added) and
add 8 acres to the Nivens Creek site (13 acres added). All of the recreation
commitments from the 1994 SMP have been met except for two ramps and one
pier at Buster Boyd (because there was insufficient parking) and the expansion
and paving of Nivens Creek (because of building code problems).
| Table 4.7-2. |
Lake Wylie Duke-Owned Public Access Areas
|
|
Access Area Name
|
Acreage
|
Shoreline Frontage (ft)
|
Boat
Ramps
|
Loading
Piers
|
Fishing
Piers
|
Car
Parking
(Spaces)
|
V/T
Parking
(Spaces)
|
|
Allen Fish
Area
|
21.0
|
1,919
|
|
0
|
0
|
29
|
0
|
|
South Point
|
70.0
|
6,747
|
6
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
165
|
|
Copperhead
|
25.3
|
3,225
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
25
|
72
|
|
Buster Boyd
|
4.4
|
632
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
51
|
119
|
|
Allison
Creek
|
113.0
|
8,653
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
15
|
90
|
|
Indian Ground
|
9.8
|
2,340
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
25
|
0
|
|
Nivens Creek
|
23.2
|
871
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
32
|
|
Ebenezer
|
20.8
|
1,374
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
160
|
70
|
|
Fort Mill
|
45.5
|
2,042
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
|
Total
|
333.0
|
27,803
|
24
|
12
|
4
|
305
|
568
|
County and City Public Recreation Facilities
Table 4.7-3 summarizes the site acreage, shoreline footage
and recreational facilities provided at the County Recreational Facilities.
There are a total of 3 County facilities and 3 City Parks.
Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden is a family oriented, educational
facility comprised of prime rolling meadows, woodlands, and lakefront
property. It began in 1989 when retired Belmont textile executive, Daniel
Jonathan Stowe, set aside 450 acres for the development of a world class
botanical garden.
In October 1999, the Garden proudly opened a new 110-acre
facility that includes four themed gardens, a 13,500 square foot Visitor
Pavilion, fountains, entrance ponds, expanded Gift and Garden Shop, and
half-mile Woodland Trail. The new gardens are a part of a Master Plan
designed by landscape architect Geoffrey Rausch that will evolve over
several decades. The completed Botanical Garden will include a conservatory
complex, rose pavilion, Asian and English gardens, natural wetland, children's
garden, restaurant, outdoor amphitheater, and lakefront access.
Approximately three miles of the Garden lies along the
eastern shoreline of the Catawba Creek arm of Lake Wylie. The planned
watercraft entrance will enable visitors to rent a slip where they can
park their boat for a certain number of hours per day. This will be the
water terminus of the garden's tram route. Visitors will be able to ride
the length of site, or they may disembark from the tram at exit points
in between.
When fully completed the Garden will represent an investment
of $150-$200 million, employ over 300 people and entertain one million
visitors a year, adding more than $36 million to the regional economy.
| Table 4.7-3. |
Summary of County Recreational Facilities
|
|
McDowell County Park
|
Copperhead
Island
|
Ebenezer
Park
|
|
952 Acres
|
25 Acres
|
26 Acres
|
|
5500 Feet of shoreline
|
3225 Feet of shoreline
|
1374 Feet of Shoreline
|
|
1 Amphitheater
|
4 Boat ramps
|
3 Boat ramps
|
|
80 Campsites
|
3 Floating loading piers
|
1 Floating loading pier with 4 slips
|
|
2 Concession Areas
|
72 Paved trailer parking spaces
|
70 Paved trailer parking spaces
|
|
1 Gazebo
|
25 Paved vehicle parking spaces
|
160 Paved vehicle parking spaces
|
|
1 Information Booth
|
1 Volleyball Court
|
17 Picnic tables
|
|
1 Maintenance Facility
|
1 Picnic Shelter
|
5 Picnic shelters with 13 tables
|
|
1 Nature Center
|
2 Restroom facilities
|
2 Restroom facilities
|
|
1 Office Complex
|
2 Fishing piers (1 handicapped accessible)
|
1 Swimming area
|
|
1 Police boathouse
|
14 Tent campsites
|
1 Bathhouse with concessions/change room
|
|
1 Paddleboat Rental Area
|
6 Overlooks
|
1 Rangers residence
|
|
210 Paved Parking Spaces
|
5 Miles of trail
|
1 Maintenance facility
|
|
37 Picnic Sites
|
1200 Feet of boardwalk for fishing
|
1 Entrance station
|
|
1 Playground
|
1 Entrance station
|
|
|
1 Ranger Residence
|
|
|
|
14 Restroom Units
|
|
|
|
1 Picnic Shelter
|
|
|
|
6 Miles of Nature Trail
|
|
|
The three city parks, River Street Park, Wind Jammer Beach
Park and Pitcarin Cove Park, are located on Lake Wylie. Table 4.7-4 summarizes
the key characteristics of these facilities.
| Table 4.7-4. |
Summary of City Public Recreation Facilities
|
|
River Street Park
|
Wind
Jammer Beach Park
|
Pitcarin
Cove Park
|
|
2 boardwalks
|
7 picnic tables
|
6 picnic tables
|
|
Nine park benches
|
1 sandy beach
|
1 boat ramp
|
|
Three grills
|
1 picnic shelter
|
1 picnic shelter
|
|
Playground
|
2 restrooms
|
2 restrooms
|
|
Covered picnic area
|
1 playground
|
1 playground
|
|
Two picnic tables
|
Paved and gravel parking lot for 25 cars
|
Paved parking lot for 15 cars
|
Existing Commercial and Private Recreation Access
In addition to the Duke-owned public access areas and
the state, county and city parks, the public can gain access to Lake Wylie
through commercial non-residential and commercial residential marinas.
Private access to Lake Wylie is through private marinas and private piers
along the Lake Wylie shoreline. Table 4.7-5 summarizes the number and
type of public and private commercial non-residential and commercial residential
marina facilities. Table 4.7-6 summarizes the estimated number of private
piers.
| Table 4.7-5. |
Summary of Lake Wylie Commercial Recreational Access
Facilities
|
|
Type of Facility
|
Commercial
Non-Residential
|
Commercial
Residential
|
|
Public Marinas
|
11
|
0
|
|
Private Marinas
|
11
|
15
|
|
Wet Slips
|
1,026
|
573
|
|
Dry Slips
|
400
|
0
|
| Table 4.7-6. |
Summary of Lake Wylie Private Recreational Access Facilities
|
|
Type of Facility
|
No. Private Facilities
|
|
Piers
|
3,108
|
Site Specific Descriptions of Existing Duke-owned Public Access Areas
at Lake Wylie
The following section provides a description of each Duke-owned
public access area at Lkae Wylie, including a photograph, site characterisitics,
site recreation facilities, and key recreation activities.
Allen Fishing Area

| Figure 4.7-2. |
Allen Fishing Area
|
The Allen Fishing Area is located in the upper portion
of Lake Wylie near the Allen Steam Station in Gaston County, North Carolina.
Table 4.7-7 summarizes key site characteristics for the Allen Fishing
Area.
| Table 4.7-7. |
Summary of Allen Fishing Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Allen Fishing Area
|
|
Location
|
Road 2798, Gaston County, NC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
21acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
Lighting
|
|
Parking
|
29 paved car parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
None
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Bank fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
South Fork arm of lake
|
|
Topography
|
Flat slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
1,919 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/NCWRC
|
South Point Access Area

| Figure 4.7-3. |
South Point Access Area
|
The South Point access area is located in the upper portion
of Lake Wylie in Gaston County, North Carolina, just north of the South
Carolina state line. Table 4.7-8 summarizes key site characteristics for
the South Point access area
| Table 4.7-8. |
Summary of South Point Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
South Point
|
|
Location
|
South Point Road, Gaston County,
NC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
70 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
6 boat ramps, 3 loading piers,
lighting
|
|
Parking
|
165 paved vehicle/trailer parking
spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
None
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, boat and bank fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
Main lake
|
|
Topography
|
Moderate/flat slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Predominantly wooded, mixed hardwoods
and conifers
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
6,747 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/ NCWRC
|
Copperhead Access Area

| Figure 4.7-4. |
Copperhead Access Area
|
The Copperhead access area is located in the middle portion
of Lake Wylie on the eastern shoreline, near McDowell Park in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. Table 4.7-9 summarizes key site characteristics
for the Copperhead access area. This site is leased to Mecklenburg County.
| Table 4.7-9. |
Summary of Copperhead Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Copperhead
|
|
Location
|
Road 1333,Mecklenburg County, NC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
25.3 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
4 boat ramps, 3 loading piers,
2 fishing piers, 1 volleyball court, 1 picnic shelter, 2 restroom
facilities, 14 tent campsites, 6 overlooks, 5 miles of trails, 1,200
feet of boardwalk for fishing, 1 entrance station
|
|
Parking
|
72 paved vehicle/trailer parking
spaces, 25 paved car parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
Fishing pier
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, fishing, camping, picnicking
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
Yes/Mecklenburg County
|
|
Key Views
|
Main lake
|
|
Topography
|
Moderate slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
3,225 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/Mecklenburg County
|
Buster Boyd Access Area

| Figure 4.7-5. |
Buster Boyd Access Area
|
The Buster Boyd access area is located in the middle portion
of Lake Wylie in York County, South Carolina near McDowell Park in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. Table 4.7-10 summarizes key site characteristics
for the Buster Boyd access area.
| Table 4.7-10. |
Summary of Buster Boyd Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Buster Boyd
|
|
Location
|
Highway 49, York County, NC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
4.4 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
4 boat ramps, 2 loading piers,
lighting
|
|
Parking
|
119 vehicle/trailer and 51 car
paved parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
Loading piers
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
Main lake
|
|
Topography
|
Flat slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Open grass areas
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
632 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/SCDNR
|
Allison Creek Access Area

| Figure 4.7-6. |
Allison Creek Access Area
|
The Allison Creek access area is located in the lower
portion of Lake Wylie in York County, South Carolina. Table 4.7-11 summarizes
key site characteristics for the Allison Creek access area.
| Table 4.7-11. |
Summary of Allison Creek Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Allison Creek
|
|
Location
|
Viesta Road, York County, SC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
113 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
4 boat ramps, 2 loading piers,
1 fishing pier, lighting
|
|
Parking
|
90 paved vehicle/trailer and 15
car paved parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
Fishing pier, loading piers
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, bank and pier fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
From fishing pier and boat ramp
areas
|
|
Topography
|
Moderate to steep slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
8,653 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/SCDNR
|
Indian Ground Access Area

| Figure 4.7-7. |
Indian Ground Access Area
|
The Indian Ground access area is located in the lower
portion of Lake Wylie, in York County, South Carolina. Table 4.7-12 summarizes
key site characteristics for the Indian Ground access area. The site is
leased to the City of Rock Hill and is only open when they take groups
to the site.
| Table 4.7-12. |
Summary of Indian Ground Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Indian Ground
|
|
Location
|
Concord Road, York County, SC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
9.8 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
1 fishing pier
|
|
Parking
|
25 paved car parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
Fishing platform
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Bank and pier fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
From fishing platform
|
|
Topography
|
Moderate slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
2,340 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/City of Rock Hill
|
Nivens Creek Access Area

| Figure 4.7-8. |
Nivens Creek Access Area
|
The Nivens Creek access area is located in the lower portion
of Lake Wylie along the eastern shoreline near Tega Cay, South Carolina.
Table 4.7-13 summarizes key site characteristics for the Nivens Creek
access area.
| Table 4.5-13. |
Summary of Nivens Creek Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Nivens Creek
|
|
Location
|
Road 99, York County, SC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
23.2 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
2 boat ramps, 1loading pier, lighting
|
|
Parking
|
32 paved vehicle/trailer parking
spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
None
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, boat and bank fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
Small cove from launch area
|
|
Topography
|
Flat to moderate slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
871 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/SCDNR
|
Ebenezer Access Area

| Figure 4.7-9. |
Ebenezer Access Area
|
The Ebenezer access area is located in the lower portion
of Lake Wylie in York County, South Carolina. Table 4.7-14 summarizes
key site characteristics for the Ebenezer access area. The Ebenezer access
area is leased to York County.
| Table 4.5-14. |
Summary of Ebenezer Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Ebenezer
|
|
Location
|
Road 195 Spur, York County, SC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
20.8 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
3 boat ramps, 1 loading pier, lighting,
17 picnic tables, 5 picnic shelters with 13 tables, 2 restroom facilities,
69 campsites with hookups, 1 swimming area, 1 bathhouse with concessions/change
room, 1 rangers residence, 1 maintenance facility, 1 entrance station
|
|
Parking
|
70 vehicle/trailer and 160 car
paved parking spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
Restrooms, picnic area, campsites
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, fishing, camping, picnicking,
swimming
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
Yes/York County
|
|
Key Views
|
Main lake
|
|
Topography
|
Flat slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
1,374 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/York County/SCDNR
|
Fort Mill Access Area

| Figure 4.7-10. |
Fort Mill Access Area
|
The Fort Mill access area is located directly downstream
of the Wylie dam in York County, South Carolina. Table 4.7-15 summarizes
key site characteristics for the Fort Mill access area.
| Table 4.7-15. |
Summary of Fort Mill Access Area Site Characteristics
|
|
Site Name
|
Fort Mill
|
|
Location
|
Road 251, York County, SC
|
|
Site Acreage
|
45.5 acres
|
|
Site Facilities
|
1 boat ramp
|
|
Parking
|
20 vehicle/trailer gravel parking
spaces
|
|
ADA Facilities
|
None
|
|
Key Recreation Activities
|
Boating, canoeing and boat and
bank fishing
|
|
Recreation Access Fees
|
None
|
|
Key Views
|
Wylie dam and riverine section
of the Catawba River
|
|
Topography
|
Flat slope
|
|
Vegetation
|
Mixed conifers and hardwoods
|
|
Shoreline Footage
|
2,042 feet
|
|
Ownership/Lease
|
Duke Power/SCDNR
|
| 4.7.2 |
Lake Wylie Recreation
Use Assessment |
Recreation Use
Visitation at the public access areas on Lake Wylie was
derived based on estimates of the traffic entering the Duke-owned public
access areas. Total estimated visitation during the 1999 study period
for Lake Wylie at these sites was about 839,531 visits. Figure 4.7-11
shows the distribution of the visitation for each month at Lake Wylie
for the Duke-owned public access areas during the 1999 study period. A
visit is considered a vehicle or vehicle/trailer entering the site for
any part of a day.

| Figure 4.7-11. |
Lake Wylie Estimate of Recreation Visitation at the Duke-Owned
Access Areas
|
Table 4.7-16 provides a summary of the estimated recreation
visitation based on the traffic counter data for the sampled sites during
the 1999 study period. Of the Lake Wylie Duke-owned access areas, Ebenezer,
Buster Boyd, and South Point were estimated to have the greatest amount
of use at about 32 percent, 23 percent, and 22 percent, respectively,
of the total estimated use at the Lake Wylie Duke-owned access areas.
Based on survey data input, the estimated ratio for annual
visits to the project area for Survey B respondents (respondents that
use both public and private access areas) compared to Survey C respondents
(respondents at the public access areas) was about a ratio of 1.3 to 1.
The estimated overall recreational visitation for Lake Wylie for the 1999
study period totaled 1,076,300 visits.
Click Here
to View Full
| Table 4.7-16 |
Lake Wylie Estimated Recreation Visitation at Duke-Owned
Access Areas
|
Spot counts were conducted at six sites for Lake Wylie,
Allen Fishing Area, Allison Creek, Buster Boyd, Fort Mill, Nivens Creek,
and South Point Access areas. Table 4.7-17 lists the number of sample
days per month for the spot count data collection.
| Table 4.7-17 |
Spot Count Collection Sites by Month
|
|
|
Month
|
| |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
Allen Fishing Area
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Allison Creek
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
Buster Boyd
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|
Fort Mill
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
Nivens Creek
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
South Point
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
The total number of surveys received for each survey is
listed in Table 4.7-18. Survey D was conducted of marina operators, therefore
numbers of surveys sent and received were low. Figure 4.7-12 shows the
distribution of recreation activity type for Survey A, Survey B, and Survey
C categories. Figure 4.7-13 shows the distribution of recreation activity
type combining data from Surveys A, B, and C, spot counts and tailrace
counts. Based on the combined data sources, the primary recreation activities
for Lake Wylie during the 1999 study period were motor boating, boat fishing,
bank/pier fishing, and swimming. For Lake Wylie, respondents indicated
that for Survey A, about 12 percent recreated on the islands, for Survey
B about 19 percent, and for Survey C about 2 percent. The combined responses
to Surveys A, B, and C indicated that about 11 percent overall recreated
on the islands of Lake Wylie. The respondents indicated that the majority
of the island activity was swimming, picnicking, fishing and camping.
| Table 4.7-18 |
Total Responses by Survey
|
|
Survey
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
E
|
Total
|
|
N=
|
137
|
129
|
127
|
17
|
410
|

| Figure 4.7-12. |
Lake Wylie Distribution of Recreation Activity Type from
Survey Data Sources
|
For Lake Wylie, the average party size (average number
of recreators in each party) for respondents to Survey A was 4.3, for
Survey B was 3.9, and for Survey C was 2.8. The average party size for
all three groups (A, B, and C) was 3.7. The average number of visits per
year for Survey B was 64.9, for Survey C was 20.7, and for combined Survey
B and C respondents was 42.9. The average length of stay for Survey B
respondents was 9.3 hours, for Survey C respondents was 5 hours, and for
combined Survey B and C respondents was 7.1 hours. About 29 percent of
the respondents to Surveys A and B indicated that Lake Wylie was the lake
they primarily recreated within the Catawba-Wateree system. For Survey
A about 38 percent and for Survey B about 13 percent of the respondents
indicated they had land abutting Lake Wylie.

| Figure 4.7-13. |
Lake Wylie Distribution of Recreation Activity Type from
all Data Sources
|
Table 4.7-19 summarizes the perceived crowding ratings
for Lake Wylie for each survey type, including responses to Surveys D
and E and a combined rating for Survey A, B, and C responses. Recreators
on Lake Wylie (Surveys A, B, and C) indicated that weekday crowding was
about mid-range (on a scale of 1 to 5), and weekend crowding was high
for survey respondents to Surveys A and B and mid-range for respondents
at the public access areas (Survey C). The marina owners indicated low
crowding levels during the week and high levels on the weekends, while
the lake rescue and management groups indicated mid-range crowding ratings
for weekdays and high crowding levels for weekends.
| Table 4.7-19. |
Lake Wylie Perceived Crowding Ratings
|
| |
Weekday
|
Weekend
|
|
Survey
|
Avg.
of Rating
|
N=
|
Avg.
of Rating
|
N=
|
|
A
|
2.4
|
119
|
4.4
|
119
|
|
B
|
2.5
|
115
|
4.4
|
117
|
|
C
|
2.0
|
41
|
2.3
|
44
|
|
Combined
A,B,C*
|
2.4
|
275
|
4.1
|
280
|
|
D
|
2.0
|
3
|
3.7
|
3
|
|
E
|
2.9
|
28
|
4.6
|
29
|
* Weighted Average
Boating Use
Figure 4.7-14 shows the distribution of boating activity
type for Lake Wylie based on Surveys A, B, and C individually comparing
the percentage of each boating activity type to the overall boating use.
The average boating party size was 3.8 for Survey A; 3.7 for Survey B;
2.5 for Survey C; and 3.3 for the combined responses for Surveys A, B,
and C. The average number of hours boating was indicated as 3.4 hours
for Survey A; 4.7 hours for Survey B; 5.1 hours for Survey C; and 4.4
hours for the combined responses for Surveys A, B, and C.

| Figure 4.7-14. |
Lake Wylie Distribution of Boating Use
|
Of the individuals surveyed who primarily recreated on
Lake Wylie, about 94 percent of the Survey A respondents owned boats.
For Survey B respondents, about 83 percent owned boats, about 68 percent
of the Survey C respondents owned boats, and for the combined responses
for Surveys A, B, and C, about 82 percent of the respondents owned boats.
Table 4.7-20 summarizes the distribution of boat ownership
by type of boat for Lake Wylie. Motor boats comprised over 57 percent
of the boat ownership, compared to the other boat categories, followed
by jet skis at about 20 percent. The ownership of motor boat types was
about 36 percent for small motor boats (ranging 20 feet or less in size)
and about 21 percent for medium motor boats (ranging between 21 to 40
feet in size).
| Table 4.7-20. |
Lake Wylie Boat Ownership Type
|
|
Survey
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
Combined
|
|
N=
|
137
|
129
|
127
|
393
|
|
Motor Boat SM
|
33%
|
45%
|
29%
|
36%
|
|
Motor Boat MD
|
23%
|
16%
|
23%
|
21%
|
|
Motor Boat LG
|
0%
|
0%
|
1%
|
0%
|
|
Canoe
|
10%
|
11%
|
14%
|
11%
|
|
Kayak
|
1%
|
1%
|
0%
|
1%
|
|
Sailboat
|
7%
|
5%
|
7%
|
6%
|
|
Jet Ski
|
19%
|
16%
|
26%
|
20%
|
|
Other Boats
|
7%
|
5%
|
0%
|
5%
|
|
Total
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
Figure 4.7-15 shows the period of the day the respondents
indicated they primarily boated, for Surveys A, B, and C. Lake Wylie was
the second primary boat launching lake of the lakes within the Catawba-Wateree
system for all survey respondents. For Survey A about 32 percent indicated
they primarily launched boats at Lake Wylie. For Survey B about 26 percent;,
for Survey C about 21 percent; and for the combined responses for Surveys
A, B, and C about 26 percent of the respondents launched boats at Lake
Wylie, compared to other lakes within the Catawba-Wateree system.

| Figure 4.7-15. |
Lake Wylie Boating Period Distribution
|
| 4.7.3 |
Lake Wylie Boat Carrying
Capacity Assessment |
The overall boat carrying capacity is assessed based on
the peak boating use estimates obtained during the aerial flyovers in
the 1999 study period. The available boating acreage was adjusted from
the base boats per acreage estimate (see Table 4.7-21) by the following
factors (Warren and Rea, 1989):
| Factor |
Adjustment
|
| 1. |
Location of the lake in relation to population
served |
0
|
| 2. |
Multiple use of water area |
-
|
|
3.
|
Shoreline configuration |
-
|
| 4. |
Amount of open water |
0
|
| 5. |
Amount of facility and shoreline development |
0
|
| 6. |
Crowding rating |
-
|
| |
Total
|
-3
|
| Table 4.7-21. |
Boat Type Acreage Adjustment
(Source: Modified from Warren and Rea, 1989)
|
|
Boat Activity Type
|
Low
|
-4
|
-3
|
-2
|
-1
|
Base
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
High
|
|
Fishing
|
10.0
|
9.0
|
8.0
|
6.0
|
5.0
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2.0
|
|
Canoe/Kayak
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
2.0
|
1.8
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
1.1
|
1.0
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
0.5
|
|
Motor Boating
|
18.0
|
17.0
|
15.0
|
13.0
|
11.0
|
9.0
|
8.0
|
7.0
|
6.0
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
|
Sailing
|
10.0
|
9.0
|
8.0
|
6.0
|
5.0
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2.0
|
|
Jet Skiing
|
10.0
|
9.0
|
8.0
|
6.0
|
5.0
|
4.3
|
4.0
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2.0
|
|
Water Skiing
|
20.0
|
18.0
|
17.0
|
15.0
|
14.0
|
12.0
|
11.0
|
10.0
|
9.0
|
8.0
|
7.0
|
Table 4.7-22 summarizes the assessment of the allowable
overall boat capacity based on the usable water surface acreage and the
boating activity mix identified from the surveys. Table 4.7-23 provides
the assessment of the percent capacity of the boat use for Lake Wylie
on the peak day during the 1999 study period. Lake Wylie during the weekday
was estimated at 19 percent capacity, during the weekend at 36 percent
capacity, and during the peak holiday period at 64 percent capacity for
overall boating use.
| Table 4.7-22. |
Lake Wylie Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment
|
|
Boat Activity
|
Usable Acreage
|
Use Factor
|
Max. No. Boats
|
% Usage
|
Boat Activity Mix
|
Persons/ Boat
|
Total Users
|
|
Fishing
|
12,859
|
8.0
|
1,607
|
23%
|
370
|
3.1
|
1,147
|
|
Canoe/Kayak
|
12,859
|
2.0
|
6,429
|
8%
|
514
|
3.3
|
1,696
|
|
Motor Boating
|
9,263
|
15.0
|
618
|
34%
|
208
|
3.9
|
812
|
|
Sailing
|
9,263
|
8.0
|
1,158
|
3%
|
38
|
3.4
|
127
|
|
Jet Skiing
|
9,263
|
8.0
|
1,158
|
13%
|
148
|
3.9
|
571
|
|
Water Skiing
|
9,263
|
17.0
|
545
|
19%
|
103
|
4.4
|
453
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
100%
|
1,381
|
|
4,806
|
| Table 4.7-23. |
Lake Wylie Estimated 1999 Study Period Boat Capacity
|
|
Peak use
|
Weekday
|
% Capacity
|
Weekend
|
% Capacity
|
Holiday
|
% Capacity
|
|
No. Boats
|
264
|
19%
|
504
|
36%
|
879
|
64%
|
The overall boat carrying capacity assessment provides
an assessment of the total surface area available for boating use. To
assess the areas of the lakes with higher density of boating use, the
general location of boating activity was recorded during the aerial flyovers
for each day of aerial coverage. Figure 4.7-16 shows the location of boats
during the peak use day for Lake Wylie. Figure 4.7-17 shows the boating
density on Lake Wylie for the peak use day and areas with the greatest
clustering of boating activity. Figure 4.7-18 shows the boat density map
based on the composite of the four highest boating use days. This figure
illustrates the areas where boating use most often occurred during the
peak use days during the study period and provides an assessment of areas
with high density boating during the study period.
|
Click Here
to View Full
Figure 4.7-16
Lake Wylie Peak Use Day Boat Counts
|
 |
|
Click Here
to View Full
Figure 4.7-17
Lake Wylie Peak Use Day Boat Density Map
|
 |
|
Click Here
to View Full
Figure 4.7-18
Lake Wylie Composite Peak Use Boat Density Map
|
 |
Lake Wylie Estimated Future Recreational Demand
Table 4.7-23 provides the population projections for the
counties within 50-60 miles of Lake Wylie reservoir. Population projections
were conducted for these impact zones using population data from the Office
of State Planning for the counties in North Carolina and from the Office
of Research and Statistics for the counties in South Carolina for 1970
through 1990 and population projections from the U.S. Census Bureau for
2000, 2010, and 2020. An average percentage increase for each ten year
period was calculated. The impact zone populations were then projected
to the year 2050 using the average percentage growth for the entire time
period.
| Table 4.7-23 |
Lake Wylie Estimated Population Projections for the Impact
Zone
|
|
County
|
1999
|
2000
|
2010
|
2020
|
2030
|
2040
|
2050
|
|
Mecklenburg
|
583,475
|
648,305
|
776,521
|
909,800
|
1,099,403
|
1,328,519
|
1,605,383
|
|
Cabarrus
|
111,064
|
123,404
|
144,126
|
165,168
|
193,710
|
227,183
|
266,441
|
|
Lincoln
|
54,839
|
60,932
|
70,132
|
79,229
|
94,689
|
113,166
|
135,248
|
|
Gaston
|
164,090
|
182,322
|
186,268
|
189,339
|
198,875
|
208,891
|
219,412
|
|
Union
|
27,720
|
30,800
|
30,800
|
33,880
|
33,532
|
33,188
|
32,847
|
|
York
|
144,990
|
161,100
|
198,600
|
214,710
|
258,662
|
311,612
|
375,401
|
|
Cherokee
|
44,370
|
49,400
|
53,300
|
58,230
|
63,835
|
69,980
|
76,717
|
|
Chester
|
51,750
|
57,500
|
58,500
|
64,250
|
69,694
|
75,598
|
82,003
|
|
Lancaster
|
30,690
|
34,100
|
36,100
|
39,150
|
41,354
|
43,682
|
46,142
|
|
Total
|
1,212,987
|
1,347,863
|
1,554,347
|
1,753,756
|
2,053,754
|
2,411,819
|
2,839,594
|
Table 4.7-24 provides the estimated recreational use for
the impact zone through the year 2050. Current use estimates are based
on spot counts and responses to surveys. The recreational use projections
were estimated by computing the projected population increase for the
impact zone and incorporating indexed values for future recreational use
for the various activities. The index values for each activity were obtained
from "Outdoor Recreation in American Life: A National Assessment
of Demand and Supply Trends" (Cordell, 1999). The indices are based
on models that incorporate a number of variables, including age structure
of the population, income, race, sex, and population density, as well
as other explanatory variables. Full model parameters and estimates are
available from the author.
Table 4.7-25 shows the estimated absorption percentage
for the four major recreation activities that require specific lands and
facilities. Picnicking, swimming, camping, and boating are activities
that require specific developed facilities. The other activities listed
are dispersed activities that can take place at a variety of undeveloped
areas. The estimated 1999 use levels are from Table 4.7-24. The estimated
demand is based on the impact zone population (population of all counties
within 50-60 miles of the lake). The impact zone population is multiplied
by the participation rate for the activity, which was obtained from "Emerging
Markets for Outdoor Recreation in the United States: Based on the National
Survey on Recreation and the Environment" by H. Ken Cordell, et al.
Participation rates are for the South and are similar to 1995 North Carolina
SCORP data. Specific participation rates are as follows: swimming, 37.3%;
picnicking, 44.8%; camping, 22.4%; boating, 45.0%. The product of the
impact zone population and participation rates are then multiplied by
the estimated of number of days of participation for each activity, which
were obtained from the 1995 North Carolina SCORP. The 1999 estimated number
of participants for each activity was then divided by the 1999 estimated
demand to obtain the estimated absorption percentage. Absorption percentage
is defined as the percent of total demand for the impact zone that is
met by the individual lake.
Table 4.7-26 provides the estimate of the recreational
facilities land acreage needed to meet the future recreational demand
through the year 2050. The weighted population is the estimated impact
zone population multiplied by the participation rate for each activity.
The facility standards and estimated acreage needs for the facility class
are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreational
Facilities. The facility need is the total facility need for the impact
zone based on the weighted population and the facility standards. The
total facility need is then multiplied by the absorption percentage to
determine the facility need for Lake Wylie. The acreage needs are then
based on the Lake Wylie facility need multiplied by per unit acreage needs
that are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreation
Facilities. For Lake Wylie, it is estimated that 146 acres are required
to accommodate future recreational facilities demand through the year
2050. This includes 8 acres of beaches, 12 acres of picnic areas, 11 acres
of campsites, and 115 acres of boat ramps.
The estimated acreage needs for the reservoir are total
usable acreage needs. Usable land acreage at existing developed public
recreational facilities can be counted toward meeting these needs. Duke
Power sites, county and state parks, and other private and public agencies
will meet these needs. There are a number of state and county parks that
are located on lands leased from Duke Power. These areas are not included
in the discussion, as Duke Power owned access areas. Duke Power is expected
to meet a portion of the future recreational land needs. The entire estimated
need will be met by a combination of opportunities from all sources.
For Lake Wylie, the most frequently identified recreational
facility needs mentioned were for more restrooms and boat ramps. Through
the AAII, additional restrooms will be provided at some access areas upon
the signing of a lease with the county agency. Duke power does not plan
to provide additional boat ramps at this time because the existing ramps
are not used to capacity, except on some weekends.
| Table 4.7-24 |
Lake Wylie Estimated Future Recreational Use
|
|
Activity
|
Est. 1999 Rec Use
|
Rec Use 2010
|
Rec Use 2020
|
Rec Use 2030
|
Rec Use 2040
|
Rec Use 2050
|
|
Motor Boating*
|
309,204
|
359,664
|
412,999
|
488,448
|
586,575
|
708,481
|
|
Boat Fishing*
|
348,715
|
432,904
|
519,643
|
629,858
|
741,397
|
855,035
|
|
Bank/Pier
Fish
|
299,132
|
371,352
|
445,757
|
540,302
|
635,981
|
733,461
|
|
Lake Swimming
|
252,173
|
306,565
|
363,927
|
443,296
|
545,936
|
678,044
|
|
Canoeing*
|
48,182
|
57,880
|
67,429
|
82,538
|
104,738
|
137,860
|
|
Jet Skiing*
|
164,658
|
191,530
|
219,932
|
260,110
|
312,365
|
377,282
|
|
Kayaking*
|
9,833
|
11,438
|
13,132
|
15,527
|
18,786
|
23,174
|
|
Tailrace
Fishing
|
26,460
|
32,848
|
39,429
|
47,792
|
56,256
|
64,878
|
|
Sailing*
|
26,847
|
31,228
|
35,859
|
42,410
|
50,930
|
61,515
|
|
Water Ski/Tubing*
|
168,860
|
196,417
|
225,544
|
266,747
|
320,336
|
386,909
|
|
Backpacking
|
1,967
|
2,696
|
3,590
|
4,820
|
6,298
|
8,132
|
|
Hunting
|
12,783
|
14,324
|
15,679
|
17,353
|
18,743
|
20,136
|
|
Tent/Vehicle
Camp
|
17,699
|
24,755
|
33,533
|
45,658
|
61,203
|
80,996
|
|
Windsurfing
|
1,967
|
2,288
|
2,627
|
3,107
|
3,731
|
4,506
|
|
Bicycling
|
9,833
|
12,523
|
15,682
|
20,046
|
24,206
|
28,985
|
|
Picnicking
|
112,514
|
142,369
|
176,185
|
223,212
|
283,239
|
359,466
|
|
Sightseeing
|
90,375
|
117,733
|
149,109
|
191,135
|
244,625
|
310,981
|
|
Hiking
|
29,797
|
39,931
|
51,657
|
67,254
|
85,474
|
106,673
|
|
Wildlife
Viewing
|
57,032
|
77,803
|
103,699
|
136,550
|
172,980
|
211,249
|
|
Using Playgrounds
|
10,816
|
13,698
|
16,848
|
21,115
|
26,567
|
33,497
|
|
Sub-total*
|
1,076,299
|
1,281,061
|
1,494,538
|
1,785,638
|
2,135,309
|
2,550,256
|
|
Total
|
1,998,846
|
2,440,037
|
2,912,260
|
3,547,278
|
4,297,366
|
5,191,260
|
| Table 4.7-25. |
Lake Wylie Estimated Absorption Percentages for Reservoir
|
|
Activity
|
Estimated
1999 Participants
|
Estimated
1999 Demand
|
Absorption
Percentage
|
|
Swimming
|
252,173
|
3,759,810
|
6.7%
|
|
Picnicking
|
112,514
|
2,336,698
|
4.8%
|
|
Camping
|
17,699
|
1,440,058
|
1.2%
|
|
Boating
|
1,076,299
|
3,002,142
|
35.9%
|
| Table 4.7-26. |
Lake Wylie Estimated Recreational Facility Land Acreage
Needs
|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
|
Activity
|
Year
|
Weighted Population
|
Facility Standard
|
Facility Need
|
Facility Class
|
Lake Wylie Share
|
Acreage
|
|
Swimming
|
2010
|
579,771
|
1 per 50,000
|
11.60
|
beaches
|
0.78
|
4.27
|
| |
2020
|
654,151
|
1 per 50,000
|
13.08
|
beaches
|
0.88
|
4.82
|
| |
2030
|
766,050
|
1 per 50,000
|
15.32
|
beaches
|
1.03
|
5.65
|
| |
2040
|
883,467
|
1 per 50,000
|
17.67
|
beaches
|
1.21
|
6.63
|
| |
2050
|
1,018,880
|
1 per 50,000
|
20.38
|
beaches
|
1.42
|
7.81
|
|
Picnicking
|
2010
|
696,347
|
1 per 500
|
1,392.69
|
tables
|
66.85
|
6.68
|
| |
2020
|
785,683
|
1 per 500
|
1,571.37
|
tables
|
75.43
|
7.54
|
| |
2030
|
920,082
|
1 per 500
|
1,840.16
|
tables
|
88.33
|
8.83
|
| |
2040
|
1,061,108
|
1 per 500
|
2,122.22
|
tables
|
103.73
|
10.37
|
| |
2050
|
1,223,749
|
1 per 500
|
2,447.50
|
tables
|
122.13
|
12.21
|
|
Camping
|
2010
|
348,174
|
6 per 1,000
|
2,089.04
|
campsites
|
25.07
|
6.27
|
| |
2020
|
392,841
|
6 per 1,000
|
2,357.05
|
campsites
|
28.28
|
7.07
|
| |
2030
|
460,041
|
6 per 1,000
|
2,760.25
|
campsites
|
33.12
|
8.28
|
| |
2040
|
530,554
|
6 per 1,000
|
3,183.32
|
campsites
|
38.90
|
9.72
|
| |
2050
|
611,875
|
6 per 1,000
|
3,671.25
|
campsites
|
45.80
|
11.45
|
|
Boating
|
2010
|
699,456
|
1 per 4000
|
174.86
|
boat ramps
|
62.78
|
62.78
|
| |
2020
|
789,190
|
1 per 4000
|
197.30
|
boat ramps
|
70.83
|
70.83
|
| |
2030
|
924,189
|
1 per 4000
|
231.05
|
boat ramps
|
82.95
|
82.95
|
| |
2040
|
1,065,845
|
1 per 4000
|
266.46
|
boat ramps
|
97.41
|
97.41
|
| |
2050
|
1,229,212
|
1 per 4000
|
307.30
|
boat ramps
|
114.68
|
114.68
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total Acreage for 2050
|
146.15
|
| 4.7.4 |
Lake Wylie Survey Respondent
Comments |
Recreators were asked in the surveys if the existing recreational
facilities within the Catawba-Wateree system met their recreational needs.
For Lake Wylie, 88 percent of Survey A (n=137); 70 percent for Survey
B (n=129); 86 percent for Survey C (n=127); and 81 percent for combined
Surveys A, B, and C, of the respondents stated that the existing facilities
met their needs. The primary facilities that were indicated as needed
at Lake Wylie included more boat ramps, picnic areas, and restroom facilities,
and camping areas around the lake. In response to whether additional boating
facilities were needed, 83 percent for Survey A (n=137); 70 percent for
Survey B (n=129); 85 percent for Survey C (n=127); and 81 percent for
combined Surveys A, B, and C felt that the existing boating facilities
were adequate. The primary boating facilities that were indicated as needed
at Lake Wylie included more marinas, pump out stations, and gas pumps.
About 47 percent for Survey A (n=137); 38 percent for
Survey B (n=129); 10 percent for Survey C (n=127); and 32 percent for
the combined Surveys A, B, and C indicated they had a negative experience
while recreating. About 39 percent for Survey A (n=137); 23 percent for
Survey B (n=129); 8 percent for Survey C (n=127); and 24 percent for the
combined Surveys A, B, and C indicated they had felt jeopardized while
recreating. The primary reasons listed for the negative experiences and
incidences when recreators felt jeopardized were the result of reckless
or inconsiderate boat or jet ski use by other recreators. Many of the
comments were related to dangerous and inexperienced operation of jet
skis and dangerous operation of boats that created large wakes or resulted
in near collisions. In addition, respondents commented that Lake Wylie
was too crowded with boat traffic. Several respondents commented on poor
water quality.
In terms of responses to additional comments, many respondents
to Surveys A, B, and C stated concerns associated with boating use on
Lake Wylie. The primary concerns were related to safety factors associated
with improper use of jet skis and boats. Respondents commented on the
need for proper boat safety education for the boaters and jet skiers and
the need for more enforcement of boating regulations. Several respondents
commented that Lake Wylie was overcrowded with boating use. Several respondents
commented on the effects of poor water quality.
When asked if they could change one
thing, respondents to Surveys A, B, and C stated that they would like
to see fewer or no jet skiing on Lake Wylie, and more boat regulation
in terms of use and size of boats allowed on the lake. Respondents also
stated concerns about water quality and pollution. Respondents to Survey
E stated that jet skis should be required to operate at low speeds in
restrictive areas, commented on overcrowding of boating activity, and
cited inappropriate boating and jet ski practices.
|