|
Table
of Contents
|
|
Introduction |
|
Project
Area Description |
|
Purpose
and Content of the Study |
|
Methodology |
|
Data
Collection |
|
Mail
Surveys and Interviews |
|
Traffic
Counts, Spot Counts, and Tailrace Counts |
|
Flyovers |
|
Existing
Recreation Areas and Facilities |
|
Data
Analysis |
|
Recreation
Use Assessment |
|
Boat
Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Recreation
Demand Assessment |
|
Limitations |
|
Consultation
|
|
Summary
of Recreation Resources |
|
Summary
of Regional Recreation Resources |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Key Characteristics |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Project Area Recreation Areas |
|
Catawba-Wateree
Project Area Recreation Use Assessment |
|
General
Recreation User Characteristics |
|
Recreation
Use |
|
Boating
Use |
|
Project
Area Recreation Resources |
|
Lake
James |
|
Lake
James Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
James Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
James Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
James Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Rhodhiss Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Hickory |
|
Lake
Hickory Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Hickory Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Hickory Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Hickory Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lookout
Shoals Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Norman |
|
Lake
Norman Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Norman Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Norman Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Norman Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Mountain
Island Lake |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Mountain
Island Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Lake
Wylie |
|
Lake
Wylie Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Wylie Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Wylie Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Wylie Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Fishing
Creek Lake Survey Respondent Comments |
|
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes |
|
Great Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Existing Recreation Areas |
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Recreation Use
Assessment |
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Boat Carrying
Capacity Assessment |
|
Great
Falls and Rocky Creek Lakes Survey Respondent Commentsss |
|
Lake
Wateree |
|
Lake
Wateree Existing Recreation Areas |
|
Lake
Wateree Recreation Use Assessment |
|
Lake
Wateree Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment |
|
Lake
Wateree Survey Respondent Comments |
|
| 3.0 |
Summary of Recreation Resources |
| 3.1 |
Summary of Regional Recreation
Resources |
The context of the recreational opportunities that are
provided by Duke Power is important in understanding, from a regional
perspective, the opportunities that exist for the general public. The
region that is considered for the Catawba-Wateree system is the area within
60 linear miles of the project. This is generally the area that is within
about an hour's drive from the project. This region should be considered
the area from which the public makes its decisions about where to recreate.
All of the resources within this region, including Duke Power owned and
operated sites, are providing opportunities to the same individuals. For
ease of understanding and categorizing, the resources will be listed according
to state and then according to managing entity.
NORTH CAROLINA
There is one Federal program that
operates recreational facilities within the project region. The U.S. Forest
Service (USFS) operates two national forests within the project region,
the Pisgah and Uwharrie National Forests. The forests offer opportunities
for camping, hiking, horseback riding, hunting, boating, off-highway vehicle
use, and fishing. The Appalachian Trail passes through the Pisgah National
Forest.
The North Carolina state programs include State Parks,
and areas run by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. There
are seven state parks in the region; Mt. Mitchell, Mt. Jefferson, New
River, Stone Mountain, Morrow Mountain, South Mountains, and Crowder's
Mountain. The parks offer opportunities for hiking, mountain biking, picnicking,
horseback riding, camping, boating, walking, environmental education,
fishing, and swimming. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
operates a number of boat ramps throughout the region. There are a total
of 11 boat ramps in the region operated by the NCWRC in addition to those
that are located on the Catawba-Wateree Lakes. They are on the South Yadkin
River, Yadkin River, High Rock Lake, Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake, Lake
Tillery, and the PeeDee River.
There are a number of other major lakes and reservoirs
in the region that supply a variety of recreational opportunities. Watauga
Lake, Wilkesboro Reservoir, High Rock Lake, Tuckertown Lake, Badin Lake,
Narrows Lake, Lake Tillery, Lake Lure, Lake Adger, and Moss Lake are all
within 60 miles of the project.
North Carolina State Trails System also provides numerous
recreation opportunities. The primary components of this trail system
include greenways and open space preservation, as well as several types
of trails. These trails include rails-to-trails, river trails, state park
system trails, and other state trails. These trails provide a recreational
travel via foot, horseback, bicycles, non-motorized water vehicles, two-wheel
drive motorized vehicles, and multiple use trails.
County and local governments provide many recreational
opportunities within the project area. There are 23 counties within the
project area that are located within the project region. Counties offer
a variety of opportunities generally tailored to the local population.
Facilities tend to include parks with walking trails, playing fields,
playgrounds, and picnic areas.
SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina offers a variety of outdoor recreational
opportunities through federal, state, and local governments, as well as
through private facilities. Public outdoor recreation areas include state
parks, scenic rivers, state forests, heritage preserves, wildlife management
areas, trails and greenways, scenic highways, national forests, national
parks, national wildlife refuges, and local facilities.
At the Federal level there are three entities that provide
recreational opportunities; the National Park Service, the USFS, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The National Park Service operates Congaree
Swamp National Monument, Cowpen's National Battlefield, and King's Mountain
National Military Park. These areas provide opportunities for camping,
boating, hiking, fishing, picnicking, environmental education programs,
museums, auto touring, and horseback riding. Sumter National Forest provides
opportunities for camping, hiking, boating, picnicking, mountain biking,
off-highway vehicle trails, and interpretive trails. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service operates the Carolina Sandhill National Wildlife Refuge.
In this area, visitors can hike, hunt, fish, picnic, or view wildlife.
The ten state parks in the project region are King's
Mountain, Chester, Dreher Island, Sesquicentennial, Poinsett, Woods Bay,
Lee, Goodale, Cheraw, and Andrew Jackson. Recreational activities at state
parks generally include natural or historic attractions, camping, lodging,
picnicking, interpretive programs, swimming, fishing, boating, hiking,
nature trails, horseback and equestrian opportunities, playgrounds, golf,
tennis, and community buildings. The South Carolina State forests within
the project region provide opportunities for hunting, fishing, hiking,
canoeing, and picnicking. The three state forests are Harbison, Manchester,
and Sand Hills.
There are a number of large lakes and reservoirs in the
project region that provide a variety of recreational opportunities. Monticello
Reservoir, Parr Reservoir, Lake Murray, and Lake Marion are within 60
miles of the Catawba-Wateree system.
There are 6 South Carolina counties located within 60
miles of the project. Counties offer a variety of opportunities generally
tailored to the local population. Facilities tend to include parks with
walking trails, playing fields, playgrounds, and picnic areas.
| 3.2 |
Catawba-Wateree Key Characteristics |
The following section summarizes key characteristics for
the entire Catawba-Wateree Project area, including classification of the
shoreline areas, summary of public recreation access facilities, and a
summary of the recreation use data collected during the 1999 study period.
For more detailed information for each lake within the Catawba-Wateree
system, see Section 4.0 of this report. Table 3.2-1 summarizes the shoreline
classification for the 11 reservoirs within the Catawba-Wateree Project
area.
| Table 3.2-1. |
Shoreline Classification for the Catawba-Wateree Project
Area*
|
|
Shoreline Classification
|
Shoreline Miles
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Commercial /Non-Residential
|
18.8
|
1.1%
|
|
Commercial /Residential
|
35.5
|
2.1%
|
|
Residential
|
589.9
|
35.7%
|
|
Business Industrial
|
6.1
|
0.4%
|
|
Public Recreation
|
8.9
|
0.5%
|
|
Public Infrastructure
|
53.8
|
3.2%
|
|
Project Operations
|
25.1
|
1.6%
|
|
Future Commercial/Non-Residential
|
170.3
|
10.3%
|
|
Future Commercial/Residential
|
101.1
|
6.1%
|
|
Future Residential
|
99.7
|
6.0%
|
|
Future Public Recreation
|
97.0
|
5.9%
|
|
Impact Minimization Zones
|
51.2
|
3.1%
|
|
Environmental Area
|
301.7
|
18.2%
|
|
Natural Area
|
94.7
|
5.7%
|
|
IMZ - D
|
1.3
|
0.1%
|
|
Total
|
1,655.7
|
100.0%
|
| 3.3 |
Catawba-Wateree Project
Area Recreation Areas |
Within the Catawba-Wateree Project area there are 51 developed
Duke-owned public recreation access areas and 4 undeveloped Duke-owned
access areas. There are 17 state, county or city parks, and 14 undeveloped
park areas within the project area. There are 41 public commercial marinas,
and 7 public residential marinas. Within the entire Catawba-Wateree Project
area, there are about 16,479 private piers. Table 3.3-1 shows the type
of access areas for each lake within the Catawba-Wateree system.
Within the 51 developed and 4 undeveloped
Duke-owned public access areas, there are about 1,903.6 acres of land
and about 145,096 feet of shoreline frontage associated with these areas.
In addition, there are 118 boat ramps, 52 loading piers, 13 fishing piers,
542 car parking spaces, and 3,273 vehicle/trailer parking spaces within
these access areas. Table 3.3-2 summarizes the facilities at these access
areas for each lake.
Click Here
to View Full
| Table 3.3-1. |
Summary of Public Recreation Access Areas within the Catawba-Wateree
System
|
Click Here
to View Full
| Table 3.3-2. |
Summary of Duke-Owned Public Access Areas within the Catawba-Wateree
System
|
| 3.4 |
Catawba-Wateree Project
Area Recreation Use Assessment |
| 3.4.1 |
General Recreation User
Characteristics |
The average age of the survey respondents was 58.4 for
Survey A; 49.6 for Survey B; 32.6 for Survey C; and 49.4 for the combined
Surveys A, B, and C. Table 3.4-1 summarizes the distribution of male and
female respondents for each survey category. For Survey A, about 63.5
percent of the respondents were from North Carolina and the remaining
36.5 percent were from South Carolina. For Survey B, about 84.3 percent
were from North Carolina and 15.7 percent were from South Carolina. For
Survey C about 75.7 percent were from North Carolina, 21.9 percent were
from South Carolina, and the remaining 2.4 percent were from other states.
| Table 3.4-1. |
Gender of the Survey Respondents.
|
|
Survey
|
Gender
|
Count
|
Percent
|
|
A
|
Female
|
86
|
19.5%
|
| |
Male
|
356
|
80.5%
|
| |
Total
|
442
|
100.0%
|
|
B
|
Female
|
161
|
24.9%
|
| |
Male
|
486
|
75.1%
|
| |
Total
|
647
|
100.0%
|
|
C
|
Female
|
149
|
23.5%
|
| |
Male
|
486
|
76.5%
|
| |
Total
|
635
|
100.0%
|
|
Combined
|
Female
|
396
|
23.0%
|
| |
Male
|
1,328
|
77.0%
|
| |
Total
|
1,724
|
100.0%
|
| |
|
|
|
For Survey A, about 93 percent, and for Survey B about
33 percent of the respondents indicated they owned land abutting one of
the lakes within the Catawba-Wateree Project area. For Survey C respondents,
only one individual indicated they had land abutting a lake within the
Catawba-Wateree system. Table 3.4-2 provides a summary of the distribution
by lake of respondents for Surveys A and B who indicated they had land
abutting the lakes.
| Table 3.4-2. |
Summary of Respondents Owning Land Abutting Lakes within
the Catawba-Wateree Project Area
|
|
Lake
|
Survey
A
|
Survey
B
|
|
Sample Size
|
Percent
|
Sample Size
|
Percent
|
|
James
|
9
|
2.5%
|
11
|
3.0%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
0
|
0.0%
|
4
|
1.1%
|
|
Hickory
|
30
|
8.3%
|
19
|
5.2%
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
6
|
1.7%
|
3
|
0.8%
|
|
Norman
|
171
|
47.2%
|
120
|
33.1%
|
|
Mountain Island
|
6
|
1.7%
|
6
|
1.7%
|
|
Wylie
|
138
|
38.1%
|
47
|
13.0%
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
2
|
0.6%
|
1
|
0.3%
|
|
Great Falls/Rocky Creek
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
Wateree
|
0
|
0.0%
|
18
|
5.0%
|
|
Total
|
362
|
100.0%
|
229
|
63.3%
|
Figure 3.4-1 shows the total visitation estimates by month
during the 1999 study period at the Duke-owned public access areas within
the Catawba-Wateree system. The visitation estimates were derived based
on estimates of the traffic entering the Duke-owned public access areas.
A visit is considered a vehicle or vehicle/trailer entering the site for
any part of a day.
Total recreation visitation for the project area was derived
based on the estimate of the ratio of the visitation indicated by Survey
B respondents (boaters and residents) compared to Survey C respondents
(recreators at the public access areas). This ratio was applied to the
estimated visitation at the Duke-owned access areas to determine the estimated
amount of visitation at other areas on the lakes. Table 3.4-3 summarizes
the estimated visitation at the Duke-owned access areas and the total
estimated use for each lake within the Catawba-Wateree system during the
1999 study period.
| Figure 3.4-1. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Estimate of Recreation Visitation
at the Duke-Owned Access Areas
|

| Table 3.4-3. |
Summary of Recreation Visitation Estimates for the Catawba-Wateree
Project Area
|
Lake
|
Duke-Owned
Access Areas Est. Rec. Use
|
Percent
of Total Duke Access Rec Use
|
Total
Est.
Rec. Use
|
Percent
of Total Rec Use
|
|
James
|
220,143
|
8.8%
|
606,977
|
10.1%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
228,010
|
9.1%
|
518,494
|
8.7%
|
|
Hickory
|
299,009
|
12.0%
|
750,468
|
12.5%
|
|
Lookout
Shoals
|
48,780
|
2.0%
|
131,867
|
2.2%
|
|
Norman
|
387,464
|
15.5%
|
908,814
|
15.2%
|
|
Mountain
Island
|
99,135
|
4.0%
|
247,753
|
4.1%
|
|
Wylie
|
839,531
|
33.6%
|
1,998,846
|
33.4%
|
|
Fishing
Creek
|
58,802
|
2.4%
|
103,500
|
1.7%
|
|
Rocky
Creek
|
23,447
|
0.9%
|
23,447
|
0.4%
|
|
Wateree
|
295,183
|
11.8%
|
692,677
|
11.6%
|
|
Total
|
2,499,504
|
100.0%
|
5,982,843
|
100.0%
|
Table 3.4-4 shows the distribution of the lakes where
respondents to Surveys A, B, and C combined indicated they primarily recreated.
Lake Norman and Lake Wylie were the two highest lakes listed as areas
where the respondents primarily recreated. Figure 3.4-2 shows the distribution
of the recreation activity by type for the entire Catawba-Wateree Project
area based on all data sources, including Surveys A, B, and C and spot
and tailrace counts.
| Table 3.4-4. |
Primary Lake Where Survey Respondents Recreate
(Based on Combined Surveys A, B, and C Responses)
|
|
Lake
|
Percent
|
|
James
|
5.2%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
1.3%
|
|
Hickory
|
9.0%
|
|
Lookout
Shoals
|
0.8%
|
|
Norman
|
38.9%
|
|
Mountain
Island
|
2.9%
|
|
Wylie
|
28.9%
|
|
Fishing
Creek
|
0.8%
|
| Great Falls/Rocky Creek |
0.0%
|
|
Wateree
|
12.3%
|
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
| Figure 3.4-2. |
CCatawba-Wateree Project Area Distribution of Recreation
Activity Type from All Data Sources
|

Tables 3.4-5 and 3.4-6 show the average perceived crowding
ratings for each survey type and the combined Surveys A, B, and C based
on weighted averages to show the overall average crowding rating, on a
scale from 1 to 5, for all recreators that responded to the surveys. Generally,
recreators at the public access areas (Survey C respondents) rated the
overall crowding levels quite a bit lower than the recreators using private
or private and public areas combined (Surveys A and B respondents).
| Table 3.4-5. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Summary of Average Crowding
Ratings (Based on Surveys A, B, and C)
|
|
Lake
|
Survey
A
|
Survey
B
|
Survey
C
|
Combined
A,B,C
|
|
Wkday
|
Wkend
|
N=
|
Wkday
|
Wkend
|
N=
|
Wkday
|
Wkend
|
N=
|
Wkday
|
Wkend
|
N=
|
|
James
|
2.13
|
4.13
|
8
|
2.39
|
4.21
|
38
|
1.21
|
1.34
|
29
|
2.08
|
3.09
|
75
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2.67
|
4.17
|
12
|
1.68
|
1.65
|
23
|
2.03
|
2.51
|
35
|
|
Hickory
|
2.57
|
4.38
|
21
|
2.50
|
4.41
|
54
|
1.75
|
2.00
|
21
|
2.31
|
3.88
|
96
|
|
Lookout
|
1.33
|
3.17
|
6
|
1.33
|
3.33
|
3
|
1.00
|
2.75
|
4
|
1.20
|
3.08
|
13
|
|
Norman
|
2.29
|
4.56
|
147
|
2.38
|
4.51
|
190
|
2.24
|
2.28
|
39
|
2.32
|
4.30
|
376
|
|
Mt.
Island
|
2.20
|
4.40
|
5
|
2.32
|
3.95
|
19
|
2.57
|
2.08
|
12
|
2.35
|
3.39
|
36
|
|
Wylie
|
2.36
|
4.44
|
119
|
2.55
|
4.38
|
117
|
2.02
|
2.30
|
44
|
2.39
|
4.08
|
280
|
|
Fishing
Creek
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
2
|
2.25
|
3.25
|
4
|
3.00
|
1.63
|
8
|
2.30
|
2.00
|
14
|
|
Great
Falls/
Rocky
Creek
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2.40
|
1.50
|
4
|
2.40
|
1.50
|
4
|
|
Wateree
|
1.80
|
3.50
|
56
|
2.30
|
3.67
|
43
|
1.61
|
2.00
|
10
|
1.96
|
3.43
|
109
|
|
Project
Total
|
2.23
|
4.25
|
364
|
2.42
|
4.30
|
480
|
1.50
|
2.60
|
194
|
2.16
|
3.97
|
1038
|
| Table 3.4-6. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Summary of Average Crowding
Ratings (Based on Surveys D and E)
|
Current Lake
|
Survey
D
|
Survey
E
|
|
Weekday
|
Weekend
|
|
Weekday
|
Weekend
|
|
|
Avg
of Rating
|
Avg
of Rating
|
N=
|
Avg
of Rating
|
Avg
of Rating
|
N=
|
|
James
|
1.67
|
3.33
|
3
|
2.50
|
3.64
|
14
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
3.00
|
4.00
|
1
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Hickory
|
3.00
|
5.00
|
1
|
2.81
|
4.14
|
21
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Norman
|
1.33
|
4.11
|
9
|
3.27
|
4.81
|
32
|
|
Mountain Island
|
2.00
|
4.00
|
1
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Wylie
|
2.00
|
3.67
|
3
|
2.93
|
4.62
|
29.0
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Great Falls/Rocky Creek
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Wateree
|
1.00
|
3.67
|
3
|
2.56
|
3.63
|
16.0
|
Within the Catawba-Wateree Project area, the primary boating
use was motor boating, followed closely by boat fishing. Table 3.4-7 summarizes
the boating distribution for each lake within the Catawba-Wateree system.
Table 3.4-8 summarizes the boat ownership type for each lake within the
Catawba-Wateree Project area. Overall, about 38 percent of the respondents
indicated they owned small boats (ranging from 20 feet or less in size)
and about 28 percent of the respondents indicated they owned medium motor
boats ranging between 21 to 40 feet in size. There were only a few respondents
who indicated they owned boats longer than 40 feet.
| Table 3.4-7. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Distribution of Boating
Use (Based on Surveys A, B, and C)
|
|
Lake
|
Motor
Boating
|
Boat
Fishing
|
Jet
Skiing
|
Canoeing/
Kayaking
|
Sailing
|
Water
Skiing/ Tubing
|
Total
|
|
James
|
26.5%
|
40.0%
|
11.6%
|
4.5%
|
2.6%
|
14.8%
|
100.0%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
18.4%
|
53.9%
|
11.8%
|
7.9%
|
0.0%
|
7.9%
|
100.0%
|
|
Hickory
|
29.3%
|
33.2%
|
15.2%
|
5.9%
|
3.5%
|
12.9%
|
100.0%
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
16.1%
|
41.9%
|
19.4%
|
6.5%
|
3.2%
|
12.9%
|
100.0%
|
|
Norman
|
33.1%
|
22.8%
|
15.0%
|
5.7%
|
6.1%
|
17.4%
|
100.0%
|
|
Mountain Island
|
31.8%
|
40.0%
|
8.2%
|
10.6%
|
0.0%
|
9.4%
|
100.0%
|
|
Wylie
|
33.7%
|
22.9%
|
12.8%
|
8.4%
|
3.3%
|
18.9%
|
100.0%
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
19.0%
|
52.4%
|
0.0%
|
14.3%
|
0.0%
|
14.3%
|
100.0%
|
|
Rocky Creek
|
8.3%
|
75.0%
|
8.3%
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
8.3%
|
100.0%
|
|
Wateree
|
33.9%
|
33.2%
|
11.0%
|
4.9%
|
4.6%
|
12.4%
|
100.0%
|
|
Total
|
31.7%
|
28.1%
|
13.4%
|
6.5%
|
4.2%
|
16.0%
|
100.0%
|
| Table 3.4-8. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Distribution of Type of
Boat Ownership (Based on Surveys A, B, and C)
|
|
Lake
|
Motor
Boat SM
|
Motor
Boat MD
|
Motor
Boat LG
|
Canoe
|
Kayak
|
Sailboat
|
Jet
Ski
|
Other
Boats
|
Total
|
|
James
|
38%
|
23%
|
0%
|
12%
|
4%
|
5%
|
14%
|
4%
|
100%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
38%
|
19%
|
0%
|
13%
|
6%
|
6%
|
17%
|
1%
|
100%
|
|
Hickory
|
41%
|
18%
|
1%
|
14%
|
1%
|
4%
|
17%
|
3%
|
100%
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
38%
|
15%
|
0%
|
12%
|
0%
|
6%
|
26%
|
3%
|
100%
|
|
Norman
|
33%
|
22%
|
0%
|
8%
|
2%
|
8%
|
21%
|
6%
|
100%
|
|
Mountain Island
|
53%
|
14%
|
0%
|
16%
|
6%
|
0%
|
10%
|
1%
|
100%
|
|
Wylie
|
36%
|
21%
|
0%
|
11%
|
1%
|
6%
|
20%
|
5%
|
100%
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
46%
|
13%
|
0%
|
25%
|
0%
|
0%
|
13%
|
4%
|
100%
|
|
Rocky Creek
|
18%
|
35%
|
0%
|
24%
|
0%
|
6%
|
18%
|
0%
|
100%
|
|
Wateree
|
41%
|
19%
|
0%
|
7%
|
4%
|
10%
|
12%
|
7%
|
100%
|
|
Total
|
37%
|
21%
|
0%
|
10%
|
2%
|
7%
|
19%
|
5%
|
100%
|
Figure 3.4-3 shows the distribution of the primary lakes
where people launched boats within the Catawba-Wateree system. Respondents
to Surveys A, B, and C indicated that Lake Norman and Lake Wylie were
the two lakes where they primarily launched their boats. Table 3.4-9 summarizes
the average boating party size and the average number of boating hours
for the combined responses to Surveys A, B, and C based on weighted averages.
| Figure 3.4-3. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Distribution of Recreation Activity
Type from All Data Sources
|

| Table 3.4-9. |
Summary of Average Boating Party Size and Boating Hours
(Based on Surveys A, B, and C)
|
|
Lake
|
Avg
No. Boaters
(Persons/Boat)
|
Avg
No. Hours
|
|
James
|
2.9
|
4.9
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
2.9
|
5.0
|
|
Hickory
|
2.9
|
4.3
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
2.7
|
4.8
|
|
Norman
|
3.4
|
4.4
|
|
Mountain Island
|
2.8
|
5.2
|
|
Wylie
|
3.3
|
4.4
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
2.4
|
5.1
|
|
Rocky Creek
|
2.4
|
4.5
|
|
Wateree
|
3.5
|
5.0
|
|
Total
|
3.3
|
4.7
|
Table 3.4-10 summarizes the total surface acreage for
each lake based on the full pond elevations; the available boating surface
acreage for each lake; the peak boat counts for weekday, weekend, and
holiday periods during the 1999 study period; and the estimated overall
boat carrying capacity for each lake. More detailed information on the
boat carrying capacity assessment is provided in Section 4.0 of this report
for each lake.
| Table 3.4-8. |
Catawba-Wateree Project Area Distribution of Type of
Boat Ownership (Based on Surveys A, B, and C)
|
|
Lake
|
Motor
Boat SM
|
Motor
Boat MD
|
Motor
Boat LG
|
Canoe
|
Kayak
|
Sailboat
|
Jet
Ski
|
Other
Boats
|
Total
|
|
James
|
38%
|
23%
|
0%
|
12%
|
4%
|
5%
|
14%
|
4%
|
100%
|
|
Rhodhiss
|
38%
|
19%
|
0%
|
13%
|
6%
|
6%
|
17%
|
1%
|
100%
|
|
Hickory
|
41%
|
18%
|
1%
|
14%
|
1%
|
4%
|
17%
|
3%
|
100%
|
|
Lookout Shoals
|
38%
|
15%
|
0%
|
12%
|
0%
|
6%
|
26%
|
3%
|
100%
|
|
Norman
|
33%
|
22%
|
0%
|
8%
|
2%
|
8%
|
21%
|
6%
|
100%
|
|
Mountain Island
|
53%
|
14%
|
0%
|
16%
|
6%
|
0%
|
10%
|
1%
|
100%
|
|
Wylie
|
36%
|
21%
|
0%
|
11%
|
1%
|
6%
|
20%
|
5%
|
100%
|
|
Fishing Creek
|
46%
|
13%
|
0%
|
25%
|
0%
|
0%
|
13%
|
4%
|
100%
|
|
Rocky Creek
|
18%
|
35%
|
0%
|
24%
|
0%
|
6%
|
18%
|
0%
|
100%
|
|
Wateree
|
41%
|
19%
|
0%
|
7%
|
4%
|
10%
|
12%
|
7%
|
100%
|
|
Total
|
37%
|
21%
|
0%
|
10%
|
2%
|
7%
|
19%
|
5%
|
100%
|
|